• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Andy Lykens

Innovating and operating through growth

  • Home
  • Podcast
  • About Andy

Posts

SPONY Recap: A panelist’s perspective.

April 8, 2010 by Andy

Tuesday evening I had the privilege of being a panelist at SPONY again. This go around I was joined by Mike Boris of McCann Erickson and Tim Joyce of Cherry Hill on the panel, and it was webcast. Before my recap, I just want to give a shout out to Joy Novie who runs SPONY. She continues to work to improve all the aspects of SPONY including format, education, and even the website. She’s done a great job so be sure to drop her a thank you note if you appreciate all her work.

There were a lot of great points to take away for me personally at the event, being that I was on a panel with someone who would be a client of mine (Mike), and someone who does something similar to my job for a different music publisher. But from my perspective, I think there were a lot of similarities in what we were all listening for and I’d like to point those out to aspiring song-writers:

Musical Points:
+ All of us were listening for songs that went somewhere. It was described as an “ah-ha” moment, as telling a story, tension and release, and so on. To get a good idea of what this means take a listen to some film trailers, TV promos, or of course ads on TV. You need not write something that’s only 30 seconds long, however your song should ALWAYS be moving somewhere.

+ There was definitely an appreciation for songs that were sonically and musically interesting. That is, those who have been writing music for a while and can speak the language of music more fluently than others really stood out.

+ Lyrical subject is irrelevant, however lyrical craft is highly desired. Often times the music was relatively strong but lyrically it was unthoughtful and seemed almost secondary. Lyrics are great, but if you’re going to write them: edit, edit, edit!

+ Energy. This was Tim’s big thing but looking back it should definitely be emphasized. It sort of ties into my first point, however, you most often won’t hear tender, slow ballads in ads or video games. Keep it moving.

+ Ad basics. Mike pointed out that mostly in advertising things need either to be relatively positive, or, if they’re negative, it is often due to humorous context.

Business Points:

+ Depending on who you contact, production value can matter more or less. However, I will say that a decent production value will go a long way in making you stand out. It just means you worked that much harder on the song.

+ Be respectful of the people you’re contacting. Mike mentioned not liking getting mp3’s via email, and we all want metadata on the CDs we get. At any rate, it’s best not to flood us with info. Just send a nice introductory email with a link or two, or send us a CD. The more professional you are, the better the chance we won’t hit delete (or toss your disc in the trash).

+ Add value. How can you make it 100% easy on the people you’re submitting to? How can you learn about the person? How much do you know about how you can best help them? As I said on the webcast, Google goes a long way!

I hope everyone who has a chance to check out SPONY takes away as much as possible about how to get better at their craft, and at selling their craft!

Filed Under: Uncategorized

SPONY Panelist – Tonight!

April 6, 2010 by Andy

Just a quick post to let you all know I’ll be one of the panelists with SPONY this evening. The event is at:

NY Women in Film & TV offices
6 E. 39th Street
12th Floor

4/6/2010
6:30 PM

For more information, click here.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Can VEVO be a thorough solution?

December 8, 2009 by Andy

Following Glenn Peoples on Twitter is really a great move if you’re in the music industry, or affected by it…or even just interested in it. Yesterday he posted about UMG’s new site VEVO which launches tonight. In case you’re unfamiliar you can read the full VEVO press release here. To sum it up for you though, VEVO is a premium video content website founded by UMG and Google who are hoping to derive ad revenue and boost retail sales before splitting the profits.

Glenn makes some really interesting points about whether or not this experiment will ultimately generate the dollars UMG and the rest of the industry have been so desperately seeking to attract in the past 10 years. But while the idea of controlling the content and limiting it to one site while not wasting loads of cash on software investment is more sound than other failed industry endeavors, I remain more wary than Mr. Peoples about whether or not this enterprise will be a success.

What labels should most be worried about is their business model. Why are they still not focusing on business practices and processes, especially after the Tim Quirk fiasco? I don’t sincerely believe that an industry that cannot use the tools its provided to keep track of the little business it does do, and honestly account for that business, can ever generate money. What little ingenuity is left in the music industry should focus on some sort of comprehensive royalty/licensing database and tracking program, not how to better harness streaming video. What about a better way to aggregate amateur content for A&R review? It only starts there, I could go on all day.

This harkens back to the same argument I posted about Spotify: if streaming video is so great and ad revenue is the way to generate dollars with music content, why hasn’t it been already done?

Glenn makes a great point when he talks about labels being great at finding, nurturing, and promoting artists – what they’re not good at is exploiting those copyrights in a way that benefits both the artist and the company that worked so at development. How is streaming video and tightly controlling that streamed video going to improve their situation? Napster already proved that the industry can’t control it’s copyrights tightly enough…then limewire did it…then YouTube…why does the platform make any difference? You may think that a music video is different than an mp3, but it’s not. The content is still focused on the artist and his or her music. The video has very little to do with it.

I’m afraid if the music industry’s best idea at this time is to hope to increase CPM’s for ad revenue then my job security may very well be in jeopardy…unless of course I go to law school as I imagine we’ll see a whole slew of lawsuits after this VEVO ordeal. Too bad I have no interest in punishing people for money, I’d rather just keep exploiting copyrights – it really isn’t that hard after all.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 69
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Get new blog posts via email

You'll get new podcast episodes, playlists, and articles.

Join 3,124 other subscribers

Subscribe to the Music Lessons Podcast...

  • Apple PodcastsApple Podcasts
  • SpotifySpotify
  • StitcherStitcher
  • Amazon MusicAmazon Music

Hear the latest episode of Music Lessons:

Copyright © 2025 · Genesis Sample on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in